by Laura Crum
And
especially beware of horse trainers who think they are gurus. You know, the
sort that imply that somehow their wonderfully in depth understanding of a
horse (in their own opinion) makes them enlightened in all aspects of life. If
you study these folks closely, by the way, their own lives are usually a train
wreck. And the biggest red flag of all? It’s when the horse trainer/guru states
oh-so-publicly that ego has nothing to do with what said trainer is proclaiming/doing.
These folks are the most ego-driven of the lot.
This
is so obvious that I would think it would go without saying, and yet over and
over again people are sucked in and deceived by these self-proclaimed “gurus,”
whether in the horse world or the spiritual world. People, wake up! Those who
know don’t talk much, and those who are busy telling everybody how wise they
are don’t usually know much. This is a good rule of life, in any discipline.
So
the other night I went to a party at which several horse people were present.
There is a reason I don’t often go to parties, and it was demonstrated to me
this particular evening. I was just returning from the bar with a weak gin and
tonic in my hand, when I got sucked into a conversation with a friend. And before
I quite knew what happened, several other people joined the group and I found
myself listening to a local horse trainer expound about a recent disaster.
I’ve
known this horse trainer for years—let’s call her Trainer Jane (not her real
name). At this point she’s a somewhat stout middle-aged woman (like me), who
has her assistants do most of the riding—and all of the difficult riding. Jane
mostly gives lessons to beginners these days. And even in her prime, she was
not quite the great hand with a horse that she would have you think. She has no
particular claim to have done well in the show ring, or really, anywhere at
all. But to hear her tell it she is a horse guru. A completely egoless horse
guru. Yeah, right.
There
wasn’t as easy route out of this group, so I listened to Jane’s story. All
about a horse she supposedly broke and trained and made a nice riding horse out
of, then sold to someone who essentially got bucked off and hurt badly. Jane’s
take on this was just enthralling some of her fans, who stood near her.
Jane
was oh-so-nobly blaming herself for this catastrophe, but not in the obvious
way. Oh no. It was not that Jane had failed to get the horse properly broke…of
course not. It was that only Jane had the skills to work with this hot horse.
The new owner, his trainer, his friends (all competent horsemen), were just not
up to the task. Jane blamed herself for selling the horse to people who clearly
weren’t horse guru enough to handle the critter. Only Jane was competent to
deal with this horse.
At
this point I was rolling my eyes...but I kept my mouth shut. What I would have
liked to have said was this: “It’s a common problem. Horse trainer essentially
steals a ride on a difficult horse, and the horse looks pretty broke, but it
isn’t. Horse trainer sells the horse to someone who isn’t expecting to have to
steal a ride (and in western horse lingo “stealing a ride” means doing
everything just-so in order to prevent a difficult horse from acting up), and
the horse comes unglued and does something violent. One of the first things I
learned when I worked as an assistant to some pretty effective horse trainers
is that you don’t steal a ride. Good horse trainers sort out what a horse has
really got—they don’t just ‘get by’ the horse. That’s asking for exactly the
kind of disaster that actually happened.”
But
of course, if I had said this, Jane would have become unglued and totally
defensive. In her view it was not that she had failed to train the horse
effectively—it was rather that others (including quite competent trainers) just
didn’t have Jane’s horse guru skills. In the past I have seen exactly how hostile
so-enlightened Jane becomes when her methods or thinking, or her all-wise guru
stance is questioned in any way. So I didn’t say anything. And I rather quickly
found a way to wiggle out of that group and rejoin my husband and son for a
game of pool. Problem solved.
Except
it bugs me. The horse world is so full of these people who are constantly
posturing about their amazing horse training prowess—in the same breath in
which they proclaim themselves free of ego. Does anybody else see the huge
contradiction in this? The basic underlying message is always “I know more
about horses than anyone around me…and by the way, there is no ego involved
here.” To top it off, usually the individual’s actual track record with horses
(let alone people) isn’t all that great. I find this both irritating and a huge
disservice to all the beginners that get taken in by these “horse gurus.” Pose
as wise and knowledgeable, and hey, presto, the naïve newcomers to the horse
world who honestly want to learn will assume that you ARE wise and
knowledgeable, and never stop to take a look at what this so knowledgeable
trainer has actually managed to accomplish with horses in his/her lifetime. Or
even consider what a train wreck this person’s life has been. These horse gurus
are feeding their egos and their pocketbooks on the admiration of those who are
relatively ignorant about horses, without really doing much to deserve it.
Believe me, I have seen this over and over again.
I
know, it’s no skin off my own back. I’ve been around the block, and I’m not
going to have my chain jerked by a guru of any sort, horse themed or otherwise.
I imagine many of you who are reading this feel the same. But do you, like me,
find it just a tad bit offensive when you are faced with this particular brand
of hypocrisy?